Height Matters: Old Lyme Zoning Commission Denies Proposal of 35-foot-tall Storage Buildings

The self-storage industry is witnessing significant zoning controversies in Old Lyme, Connecticut. The local Zoning Commission recently rejected a planning application for three 35-foot-tall storage buildings. This marks the second dismissal of the storage construction project initiated by Kid’s Realty, LLC and Pond Road, LLC. The Zoning Commission's dismissal delved into the complexities surrounding the appropriateness of use, public health and environmental issues, revenue impacts, and impact on neighboring property values.

The critical narrative can be traced to the CT Examiner's detailed report. Their extensive coverage detailed the Zoning Commission's meeting and the revisiting of rejected applications for the proposed storage unit facility at 250 Shore Road.

The project developers, represented by attorney Marjorie Shansky, submitted their application for the third time. However, the proposal was disapproved again due to the lack of precedent for buildings of that height in the residential beach community, resulting in increased public concern.

Commission chair Paul Orzel spearheaded the discussion, opposing the construction of the proposed facility that he asserted would better suit an industrial park rather than a beach community without precedent on Route 156.

The current trend of storage facilities leans toward one-story structures, as observed in the self-storage facilities at 332 Shore Road. The proposed colossal 3-story building introduces associated risks that the commission deems ill-advised.

As per Orzel, introducing such a large-scale facility would invite equipment and maintenance-related issues, alongside possible fuel spillage risks. He further cited the town's “appropriateness of use” zoning ordinance, raising questions about the harmony, orderly development, and detrimental effects on adjacent properties.

Notably, some Commission members like Mike Miller and alternate Sloan Danenhower showcased support for the application, appreciating the design aesthetics and transparency in inspections, claiming this was the least impactful project for the commercial property. Mary Jo Nosal and Tammy Tinnerello opposed it.

The recent denial has elicited conversations around a six-month moratorium on self-storage facilities, prompting the need for revision or possible banning of regulations.

🔒📚 Hi! I'm Eric Manning, a self-storage operations nerd, and lifelong learner. 🗝️ My articles blend industry know-how with a dash of humor and wisdom. Whether you're a storage newbie or a pro, join me as we explore the world of storage, one witty insight at a time! 📦😊🔑